MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053317120 · doi:10.1116/1.2734150

Micro-optical switch device based on semiconductor-to-metallic phase transition characteristics of W-doped VO2 smart coatings

2007· article· en· W2053317120 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Soltani, Mohamed Chaker, E. Haddad, Roman V. Kruzelecky, J. Margot

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMPB Technologies & Communications (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceTransmittanceOptical switchOptoelectronicsSemiconductorDopingMicrofabricationSwitching timeVoltagePhase transitionFabricationElectrical engineeringCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors have successfully fabricated planar micro-optical switch device exploiting the transmitting semiconductor (on) to the reflecting metallic (off) phase transition of thermochromic W(1.4at.%)-doped VO2 smart coatings and driven by an external voltage. The starting W-doped VO2-coated Al2O3 exhibited infrared transmittance switching about 45%. After the microfabrication, the temperature dependence of electrical resistance of the micro-optical switch showed clearly its well-known semiconductor-to-metallic phase transition at a transition temperature of 36°C. A reversible transmittance switching (on/off) as high as 28dB was achieved with this device at λ=1.55μm. In addition, the transmittance switching modulation of the device was demonstrated at 1.55μm by switching the micro-optical switch simultaneously with dc and ac voltages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and FilmsSame topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207