MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053333048 · doi:10.3928/00220124-20110615-01

Making a Difference: The Value of Preceptorship Programs in Nursing Education

2011· article· en· W2053333048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsHumber River Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreceptorNursingNurse educationProfessional developmentMedicineValue (mathematics)PsychologyClinical PracticeMedical educationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The benefits of clinical nursing experience in nursing education cannot be overemphasized. Literature has shown that proficient clinical nursing education enhances nursing practice through the development of professional growth with opportunities for the application of theoretical knowledge. Clinical preceptorship has been shown to be an effective method in the development of professional nurses through clinical education. The role of a clinical nursing preceptor is complex and not necessarily applicable to all nurses. Understanding the clinical environment, comprehending individual learning styles, and dealing effectively with conflict are skills that an effective preceptor needs to acquire before participating in the role. This article describes the origin of the preceptor role in clinical nursing education and discusses how the role can be enhanced through a proficient and well-planned preceptorship education program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it