Assimilation of Infrared Radiances in the Context of Observing System Simulation Experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) capability developed at Environment Canada allows simulation of all observation types currently used operationally as well as future data types. Its infrastructure, based on the operational global data assimilation system used at the Canadian Meteorological Centre, was recently enhanced to conduct data assimilation experiments for two future satellite missions. This study presents a subcomponent of that system, focusing on the assimilation of infrared radiances from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) instruments. The goal is to realistically simulate the radiance observations and to reproduce statistical characteristics of these data seen in the real system, notably background and analysis departures. Care is taken to emulate the operational quality control procedures leading to the assimilation of clear radiances, which implies radiance simulation for all-sky conditions. It is found that the standard deviation of the Gaussian random perturbation applied to the simulated observations should be close to that of the radiometric noise level for sounding channels in the 13.0–14.5- μ m region but that it should be significantly higher for water vapor channels in the 5.5–6.7- μ m region. The study also allows evaluation of residual biases linked to cloud contamination. For atmospheric window channels, that bias can reach −0.4 K. It reduces rapidly with peak height of the channel response function. This suggests that improvements are needed in low-cloud detection. The realism of the OSSE is further demonstrated through the shown impact consistency of AIRS and IASI radiance assimilation in forecasts up to 5 days from the separate use of simulated and real observations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".