MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Plus Ça Change? ‘Correcting’ Inuit Inmates in Nunavut, Canada

2006· article· en· W2053366874 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tammy Landau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousRhetorical questionPoliticsContext (archaeology)Representation (politics)Economic JusticeColonialismCriminologyCriminal justicePolitical scienceSociologyGender studiesEthnologyHistoryLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Criminal justice reform in the context of indigenous peoples in Canada has been motivated by both their over‐representation at each stage of the administration of justice and their extreme cultural, social and political dislocation. The extent to which reforms can overcome institutionalised colonial practices is challenged by the experiences of Inuit inmates in Nunavut. It is argued that the correctional response to indigenous people in Canada is largely rhetorical and has led to few meaningful changes to the lives of Inuit inmates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Howard Journal of Criminal JusticeSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207