HOW DO TOILET-TRAINED KIDS VOID FOLLOWING TUBULARIZED INCISED PLATE REPAIR OF HYPOSPADIAS?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
You have accessJournal of Urology1 Apr 2009HOW DO TOILET-TRAINED KIDS VOID FOLLOWING TUBULARIZED INCISED PLATE REPAIR OF HYPOSPADIAS? Waleed Eassa, Fayez Almodhen, Alexander Brzezinski, Jean Paul Capolicchio, Roman Jednak, and Mohamed T El-Sherbiny Waleed EassaWaleed Eassa More articles by this author , Fayez AlmodhenFayez Almodhen More articles by this author , Alexander BrzezinskiAlexander Brzezinski More articles by this author , Jean Paul CapolicchioJean Paul Capolicchio More articles by this author , Roman JednakRoman Jednak More articles by this author , and Mohamed T El-SherbinyMohamed T El-Sherbiny More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(09)60323-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "HOW DO TOILET-TRAINED KIDS VOID FOLLOWING TUBULARIZED INCISED PLATE REPAIR OF HYPOSPADIAS?." The Journal of Urology, 181(4S), p. 113 © 2009 by American Urological AssociationFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 181Issue 4SApril 2009Page: 113 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2009 by American Urological AssociationMetricsAuthor Information Waleed Eassa More articles by this author Fayez Almodhen More articles by this author Alexander Brzezinski More articles by this author Jean Paul Capolicchio More articles by this author Roman Jednak More articles by this author Mohamed T El-Sherbiny More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".