Rigomer Bazin et la Restauration : penser la république dans la monarchie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le parcours de Rigomer Bazin (1769-1818), permet de mieux saisir les diverses attitudes que les républicains démocrates, fidèles au projet de construction d’une démocratie représentative, doivent adopter durant le Directoire, le Consulat, l’Empire, et la Restauration, face aux divers appareils de censure auxquels ils sont confrontés.La vie politique de la Restauration jusqu’en 1818, permet au journaliste constitutionnel du Mans, de penser les conditions d’adaptation de la Charte aux idées républicaines. Au cœur de ce projet d’émancipation de l’opinion publique, se trouvent le désir de fondation d’une citoyenneté active et la volonté de réalisation des conditions objectives d’un jeu politique, respectueux des droits de l’opposition par l’alternance des partis au pouvoir. L’histoire et l’éducation doivent constituer les fondements d’un civisme nouveau. Une république confédérale européenne représenterait l’étape suivante de l’union d’un continent pacifié, autour d’un programme politique partagé et discuté en son parlement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".