MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053397145 · doi:10.1080/19440049.2014.888498

Occurrence of ochratoxin A in Canadian wheat shipments, 2010–12

2014· article· en· W2053397145 on OpenAlex
Sheryl A. Tittlemier, Mike Roscoe, Richard Blagden, Colleen Kobialka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Additives & Contaminants Part A · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHealth CanadaIndustry Canada
KeywordsOchratoxin AEuropean commissionWinter wheatMycotoxinGeographyAnimal scienceToxicologyBiologyAgronomyBiotechnologyBusinessEuropean unionInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Randomly selected domestic and export shipments (n = 1907) of Canadian durum and other wheat that occurred between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012 were analysed for ochratoxin A (OTA). The majority of samples did not contain OTA above the LOQ of 1 μg kg⁻¹. Only 37% of samples analysed contained quantifiable OTA; the median OTA of the positive results was 2.10 μg kg⁻¹. Canada Western Amber Durum shipments contained OTA more frequently, and at slightly higher concentrations, than Canada Western Red Spring wheat. For both wheat classes the frequency of OTA occurrence and mean concentrations appeared to increase in the lower grades, but these increases were not statistically significant. A periodic trend of a late summer increase of mean monthly OTA concentrations in shipments appears tied to the cycle of producer deliveries of wheat to primary grain elevators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it