MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053399310 · doi:10.1109/socc.2014.6948970

A body-bias based current sense amplifier for high-speed low-power embedded SRAMs

2014· article· en· W2053399310 on OpenAlexaff
Tahseen Shakir, Manoj Sachdev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSense amplifierCurrent sense amplifierCMOSStatic random-access memoryAmplifierComputer scienceTransistorElectronic engineeringLow-power electronicsElectrical engineeringInput offset voltageVoltageOffset (computer science)EngineeringPower (physics)Operational amplifierPower consumption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in CMOS technology has resulted in ever growing demand in on-chip high-density low-power SRAMs. A miniaturized low voltage-operated SRAM cell ability to generate adequate swing on heavily loaded bitlines is a serious design concern. In addition, Process, Voltage and Temperature variation PVTs in nanometric CMOS regime results in significant SARM cell parameters deviation. Sense amplifier offset voltage is the bottleneck in successful SRAM read operation. Therefore, offset voltage-insensitive current sense amplifiers are usually adopted in high performance SARMs. Read-assist techniques start to merge in the sate-of-the-art high-speed low-power SRAMs. This work presents a new high speed low power current sense amplifier. The proposed scheme utilizes transistor body bias to control the bitlines differential current. Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to validate the proposed scheme performance in presence of PVTs variations. Compared to conventional schemes, up to 28% in read failures reduction at 25mV bitlines swing is achieved. In addition, a 41% improvement in speed and up to 2.5X times less bitlines swing requirement at 0.6 V operating voltage is also verified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.554
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207