Abnormal Coagulation Tests Are Associated With Progression of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is common in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and a major determinant of death and disability. ICH commonly increases in size and coagulopathy has been implicated in such progression. We investigated the association between coagulopathy diagnosed by routine laboratory tests and ICH progression. METHODS: Subgroup post hoc analysis from a randomized controlled trial including adult patients with blunt severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score <or=8) and repeat computerized tomography scans in 48 hours. Coagulopathy was defined as international normalized ratio >or=1.3, activated partial thromboplastin time >or=35, or platelet count (PLT) <or=100 x 10/L any time in the first 24 hours. Progression was any size increase or new ICH. TBI-associated coagulopathy was investigated measuring soluble tissue factor (TF) and d-dimer. RESULTS: The ICH progressed in 37 of 72 patients (51%), in 80% if any abnormal laboratory test (coagulopathic patients) versus 36% in noncoagulopathic (p = 0.0004). Abnormal international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 4.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.29-12.95; p = 0.017), PLT (OR = 12.59; 95% CI = 1.52-108.57; p = 0.019), head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) (OR = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.15-2.88; p = 0.011) were significantly associated with progression (univariate analysis). In a multiple logistic regression, only head AIS (OR = 1.81; 95% CI 1.10-2.98; p = 0.0198) and PLT (OR = 11.8; 95% CI = 1.38-101.23; p = 0.024) correlated with progression. All patients with abnormal partial thromboplastin time experienced progression. ICH progression carried a 5-fold higher odds of death; 32% with progression died versus 8.6% without. Age, head AIS, Injury Severity Score, and d-dimer were also associated with mortality. Tissue factor was not associated with progression or mortality. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an association between coagulopathy, diagnosed by routine laboratorial tests in the first 24 hours, with ICH progression; and ICH progression with mortality in patients with severe TBI. The causal relationship between coagulopathy and ICH progression will require further studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".