Who can say yes (or no) to a physician—and how does the physician know they can?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<b>Objective:</b> To characterize the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in the nervous system (NeuroIRIS) among patients with HIV/AIDS. <b>Background:</b> NeuroIRIS has been recognized as a complication of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis was performed of NeuroIRIS patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria and followed at the Northern or Southern Alberta (HIV) Clinics. A nested epidemiologic study was performed within a subset of patients in whom cART was started from 1999 to 2007. <b>Results:</b> NeuroIRIS was diagnosed in seven patients initiating cART. All were men (median age, 35 years) and exhibited severe immunosuppression (median CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells, 30 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>). Four patients presented to the Southern Alberta Clinic, representing all NeuroIRIS cases among 461 patients in whom cART was initiated over an 8-year period (incidence 0.9%). New onset of neurologic deterioration (n = 4) or worsening of prior neurologic disabilities (n = 3) due to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, toxoplasmic encephalitis, and cryptococcal meningitis occurred between 2 to 25 weeks after the initiation of cART. All patients demonstrated a robust increase in blood CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cell count in response to cART. A brain biopsy in one patient revealed inflammation and necrosis together with CD68<sup>+</sup> macrophage and CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cell infiltrates, which were also CD40 and CD154 immunoreactive. Two patients received corticosteroids as treatment for NeuroIRIS with an overall survival of 86%, while 14% exhibited fixed neurologic disabilities. <b>Conclusions:</b> Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in the nervous system (NeuroIRIS) remains an uncommon complication of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) but with a potentially poor outcome. Initiation of cART in very immunosuppressed patients requires close monitoring to manage NeuroIRIS in an expedient manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".