MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053413526 · doi:10.12735/psi.v1n1p24

Effect of TDZ on Direct Shoot Regeneration from Whole Male Inflorescence of Four Diploid Banana Cultivars from South India

2014· article· en· W2053413526 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
P.D. Smitha, K. R. Binoy, Ashalatha S. Nair

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Science International · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBanana Cultivation and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflorescenceCultivarShootPloidyBiologyRegeneration (biology)BotanyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Male inflorescence has great potential to be used as explants for rapid micropropagation of Musa species. In this work whole inflorescence was used as the explant for the propagation. The male flower of four diploid banana cultivars namely Musa acuminata cv. Matti and M. acuminata cv. Sannachenkadali, M. acuminata cv. Chingan and Musa acuminata cv. Njalipoovan (2n= 22) belonging to diploid genome types (AA and AB) were selected for the present study. These diploid tolerant cultivars grown in south Indian states are in great demand because of their fruit quality and consumer preference. Direct shoot regeneration was achieved from whole male inflorescence which is inoculated in MS medium supplemented with varying concentrations of BA, TDZ and KIN. All the four cultivars produced the maximum number of shoots in the presence of varying concentrations of TDZ (0.45µM -13.5 µM) irrespective of their genotypes. Male inflorescence reduces the rate of contamination compared to suckers and produces a more number of shoots in culture conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Science InternationalSame topicBanana Cultivation and ResearchFrench-language works237,207