The role of four key structures in the creation and survival of cultural landscapes in the desert environment of Iran
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractCultural landscapes in the desert environment of Iran were created according to specific climatic conditions and differ from those in other climates. Scarcity of water resources in these regions has led to the invention and application of unique measures for the supply, maintenance and use of water. The qanat, cistern, ice-house and wind catcher are ingenious measures that have had key roles in the settlement of man in desert regions of Iran and ideally addressed the specific needs of each community over centuries. This study illustrates the significance and relationship of these elements in the creation and survival of cultural landscapes in the desert environment of Iran. To this end, their features are discussed and analyze separately and as ensembles which in turn presents a sustainable way of living in desert regions.Keywords: cultural landscapedesert environmentqanatcisternice-housewind catcher Notes on contributorMaryam Rafiee Fanood, MSc graduated with a masters’ degree in conservation and the revitalization of historical buildings and sites from Iran University of Science and Technology in 2009. She subsequently joined the Erasmus Mundus postgraduate programme on the management of cultural landscapes. Numerous theoretical and practical training sessions in different parts of Europe and a successful internship at Heritage Malta in 2011 have enabled Maryam to develop her knowledge and skills in cultural heritage conservation. She is currently working as a cultural heritage researcher and consultant, participating in different conservation projects in Iran.Notes1. UNESCO World Heritage Center, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris, 2008.2. Lennon, J. and Mathews, S., Cultural Landscape Management: Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Cultural Landscapes in the Australian Alps National Parks, Jane Lennon & Associates, heritage consultants, 1996.3. Ghobadian, V., Climatic Analysis of the Iranian Traditional Buildings, Tehran University Press, Tehran, 2001.4. Monshizade, A., ‘The desert city as an ancient living example of ecocity. Case study: Yazd’, in Proceeding of Ecocity World Summit 2008. 7th International Ecocity Conference, Academic and Talent Scouting Sessions, 2008, 6–12, Ecocity Builders, Berkeley.5. Sajjadi, M. S., Qanat/Kariz: Storia, Tecnica Construttiva ed Evoluzione, Istituto Italiano di Cultura, Tehran, 1982.6. Boustani, F, ‘Sustainable water utilization in arid region of Iran by qanats’,International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, no. 4, 2009, pp. 505–508.7. UNESCO World Heritage Center, Report of the Decisions Adopted at the Twenty-eighth Session of the World Heritage Committee, Suzhou, June 28–July 7, UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris, 2004. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2004/whc04-28com-26e.pdf8. UNESCO World Heritage Center,Nomination file of the Persian Gardens, 2011. http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/1372.pdf ; Report of the Decisions Adopted at the Thirty-fifth Session of the World Heritage Committee, Paris, June 19–29, UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris, 2011. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2011/whc11-35com-20e.pdf9. English, P. W., ‘Qanats and lifeworlds in Iranian plateau villages’,.Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Transformations of Middle Eastern Natural Environments: Legacies and Lessons, no. 103, 1998, pp. 187–205.10. Behnia, A., Qanat Construction and Qanat Maintenance, Tehran University Press, Tehran, 1988.11. Sadeghi, N., Salih, A., and Saeidabadi, M. R., ‘Indigenous knowledge responding to global changes: Qanats, an ancient sustainable tool for groundwater management’, i ed. Freid, J. and Scherfig, J., Proceedings of International Conference on Water Scarcity, Global Changes, and Groundwater Management Responses, University of California, Irvine, 2008, pp. 1–8.12. Zargar, A., An introduction to the Iranian Rural Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran,, 2007.13. Salih, A., ‘Qanats a unique groundwater management tool in arid regions: the case of bam region in Iran’, paper presented at the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability (ISGWAS), Alicante, Spain, 2006. http://aguas.igme.es/igme/ISGWAS/Ponencias%20ISGWAS/6-Salih.pdf14. Wulff, H. E., ‘The Qanats of Iran’, Scientific American, no. 218, 1968, pp. 94–105.15. Kuros, Gh. and Labbaf Khaneiki, M., Water and Irrigation Techniques in Ancient Iran, Iranian National committee on Irrigation and Drainage, Tehran (IRNCID), 2007. http://www.scribd.com/doc/20475423/Water-Irrigation-Techniques-in-Ancient-Iran-200716. See notes 6 and 9.17. See note 3.18. Pirnia, M. K., An Introduction to the Islamic Architecture of Iran, Soroush-e Danesh, Tehran, 2005.19. Tabatabaee Yazdi, J., ‘Ab-anbar, the ancient underground water’, in Proceeding of the International History Seminar on Irrigation and Drainage, 2007, The Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (IRNCID), Tehran, pp. 467–484.20. Hensel, M., Sunguroğlu Hensel, D., Gharleghi, M., and Craig, S., ‘Towards an architectural history of performance: auxiliarity, performance and provision in historical Persian architectures, Iran – past, present and futures’, AD Architectural Design, no. 82, 2012, pp. 26–37.21. See note 19.22. Faghih, A. K. and Bahadori, M. N., ‘Experimental investigation of air flow over domed roofs’, Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, no. 33, 2009, pp. 207–216.23. Ahmadkhani Maleki, B., ‘Wind catcher: passive and low energy cooling system in Iranian vernacular architecture’, International Journal of Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering (IJTPE), no. 3, 2011, pp. 130-137.24. See note 18.25. See note 6.26. See note 3.27. Bahadori,M. N., ‘Passive cooling systems in Iranian architecture’, Scientific American, no. 238, 1978, pp. 144–154.28. A'zami, A., ‘Badgir in traditional Iranian architecture’,. ed. Santamouris, M., Proceedings of International Conference Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment: PALENC 2005, , 2005, Heliotopos Conferences, Santorini,, pp. 1021–1026.29. See note 3.30. Amirkhani, A., Okhovat, H., Pourjafar, M. R., and Zamani, E., ‘Historical ice-houses: remarkable example of Iranian cultural heritage’, Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, no. 4, 2009, pp. 5–10.31. Hosseini, B. and Namazian, A., ‘An overview of Iranian ice repositories, an example of traditional indigenous architecture’, METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, no. 29, 2012, pp. 223–234.32. Beazley, E., ‘Some vernacular buildings of the Iranian plateau’, Iran, no. 15, 1977, pp. 89–102.33. See note 15.34. Soltani, G. H., Nazari, A., and Ghanavati, N., ‘Energy management in Iranian maintainable ancient architecture “introducing ice houses and cisterns in Yazd City”’, Canadian Journal on Environmental, Construction and Civil Engineering, no. 3, 2012, pp. 173–178.35. See note 3.36. See note 34.37. See note 15.38. See note 10.39. See note 31.40. Bahadori, M. N., “Viability of wind towers in achieving summer comfort in the hot arid regions of the Middle East’, Renewable Energy, no. 5, 1994, pp. 879–892.41. Bansal, N. K., Mathur, R., and Bhandari, M. S., ‘A study of solar chimney assisted wind tower systems for natural ventilation in buildings’, Building & Environment, no. 29, 1994, pp. 495–500.42. Khan, N., Su, Y., and Riffat, S. B., ‘A review on wind driven ventilation techniques’, Energy and Buildings, no. 40, 2008, pp. 1586–1604.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it