MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2053413795 · doi:10.1080/13556207.2014.985490

The role of four key structures in the creation and survival of cultural landscapes in the desert environment of Iran

2014· article· en· W2053413795 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Architectural Conservation · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueWater management and technologies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDesert (philosophy)Key (lock)GeographyPolitical scienceComputer scienceLawComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AbstractCultural landscapes in the desert environment of Iran were created according to specific climatic conditions and differ from those in other climates. Scarcity of water resources in these regions has led to the invention and application of unique measures for the supply, maintenance and use of water. The qanat, cistern, ice-house and wind catcher are ingenious measures that have had key roles in the settlement of man in desert regions of Iran and ideally addressed the specific needs of each community over centuries. This study illustrates the significance and relationship of these elements in the creation and survival of cultural landscapes in the desert environment of Iran. To this end, their features are discussed and analyze separately and as ensembles which in turn presents a sustainable way of living in desert regions.Keywords: cultural landscapedesert environmentqanatcisternice-housewind catcher Notes on contributorMaryam Rafiee Fanood, MSc graduated with a masters’ degree in conservation and the revitalization of historical buildings and sites from Iran University of Science and Technology in 2009. She subsequently joined the Erasmus Mundus postgraduate programme on the management of cultural landscapes. Numerous theoretical and practical training sessions in different parts of Europe and a successful internship at Heritage Malta in 2011 have enabled Maryam to develop her knowledge and skills in cultural heritage conservation. She is currently working as a cultural heritage researcher and consultant, participating in different conservation projects in Iran.Notes1. UNESCO World Heritage Center, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris, 2008.2. Lennon, J. and Mathews, S., Cultural Landscape Management: Guidelines for Identifying, Assessing and Managing Cultural Landscapes in the Australian Alps National Parks, Jane Lennon & Associates, heritage consultants, 1996.3. Ghobadian, V., Climatic Analysis of the Iranian Traditional Buildings, Tehran University Press, Tehran, 2001.4. Monshizade, A., ‘The desert city as an ancient living example of ecocity. Case study: Yazd’, in Proceeding of Ecocity World Summit 2008. 7th International Ecocity Conference, Academic and Talent Scouting Sessions, 2008, 6–12, Ecocity Builders, Berkeley.5. Sajjadi, M. S., Qanat/Kariz: Storia, Tecnica Construttiva ed Evoluzione, Istituto Italiano di Cultura, Tehran, 1982.6. Boustani, F, ‘Sustainable water utilization in arid region of Iran by qanats’,International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, no. 4, 2009, pp. 505–508.7. UNESCO World Heritage Center, Report of the Decisions Adopted at the Twenty-eighth Session of the World Heritage Committee, Suzhou, June 28–July 7, UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris, 2004. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2004/whc04-28com-26e.pdf8. UNESCO World Heritage Center,Nomination file of the Persian Gardens, 2011. http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/nominations/1372.pdf ; Report of the Decisions Adopted at the Thirty-fifth Session of the World Heritage Committee, Paris, June 19–29, UNESCO World Heritage Center, Paris, 2011. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2011/whc11-35com-20e.pdf9. English, P. W., ‘Qanats and lifeworlds in Iranian plateau villages’,.Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Transformations of Middle Eastern Natural Environments: Legacies and Lessons, no. 103, 1998, pp. 187–205.10. Behnia, A., Qanat Construction and Qanat Maintenance, Tehran University Press, Tehran, 1988.11. Sadeghi, N., Salih, A., and Saeidabadi, M. R., ‘Indigenous knowledge responding to global changes: Qanats, an ancient sustainable tool for groundwater management’, i ed. Freid, J. and Scherfig, J., Proceedings of International Conference on Water Scarcity, Global Changes, and Groundwater Management Responses, University of California, Irvine, 2008, pp. 1–8.12. Zargar, A., An introduction to the Iranian Rural Architecture, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran,, 2007.13. Salih, A., ‘Qanats a unique groundwater management tool in arid regions: the case of bam region in Iran’, paper presented at the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability (ISGWAS), Alicante, Spain, 2006. http://aguas.igme.es/igme/ISGWAS/Ponencias%20ISGWAS/6-Salih.pdf14. Wulff, H. E., ‘The Qanats of Iran’, Scientific American, no. 218, 1968, pp. 94–105.15. Kuros, Gh. and Labbaf Khaneiki, M., Water and Irrigation Techniques in Ancient Iran, Iranian National committee on Irrigation and Drainage, Tehran (IRNCID), 2007. http://www.scribd.com/doc/20475423/Water-Irrigation-Techniques-in-Ancient-Iran-200716. See notes 6 and 9.17. See note 3.18. Pirnia, M. K., An Introduction to the Islamic Architecture of Iran, Soroush-e Danesh, Tehran, 2005.19. Tabatabaee Yazdi, J., ‘Ab-anbar, the ancient underground water’, in Proceeding of the International History Seminar on Irrigation and Drainage, 2007, The Iranian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (IRNCID), Tehran, pp. 467–484.20. Hensel, M., Sunguroğlu Hensel, D., Gharleghi, M., and Craig, S., ‘Towards an architectural history of performance: auxiliarity, performance and provision in historical Persian architectures, Iran – past, present and futures’, AD Architectural Design, no. 82, 2012, pp. 26–37.21. See note 19.22. Faghih, A. K. and Bahadori, M. N., ‘Experimental investigation of air flow over domed roofs’, Iranian Journal of Science & Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, no. 33, 2009, pp. 207–216.23. Ahmadkhani Maleki, B., ‘Wind catcher: passive and low energy cooling system in Iranian vernacular architecture’, International Journal of Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering (IJTPE), no. 3, 2011, pp. 130-137.24. See note 18.25. See note 6.26. See note 3.27. Bahadori,M. N., ‘Passive cooling systems in Iranian architecture’, Scientific American, no. 238, 1978, pp. 144–154.28. A'zami, A., ‘Badgir in traditional Iranian architecture’,. ed. Santamouris, M., Proceedings of International Conference Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment: PALENC 2005, , 2005, Heliotopos Conferences, Santorini,, pp. 1021–1026.29. See note 3.30. Amirkhani, A., Okhovat, H., Pourjafar, M. R., and Zamani, E., ‘Historical ice-houses: remarkable example of Iranian cultural heritage’, Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, no. 4, 2009, pp. 5–10.31. Hosseini, B. and Namazian, A., ‘An overview of Iranian ice repositories, an example of traditional indigenous architecture’, METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, no. 29, 2012, pp. 223–234.32. Beazley, E., ‘Some vernacular buildings of the Iranian plateau’, Iran, no. 15, 1977, pp. 89–102.33. See note 15.34. Soltani, G. H., Nazari, A., and Ghanavati, N., ‘Energy management in Iranian maintainable ancient architecture “introducing ice houses and cisterns in Yazd City”’, Canadian Journal on Environmental, Construction and Civil Engineering, no. 3, 2012, pp. 173–178.35. See note 3.36. See note 34.37. See note 15.38. See note 10.39. See note 31.40. Bahadori, M. N., “Viability of wind towers in achieving summer comfort in the hot arid regions of the Middle East’, Renewable Energy, no. 5, 1994, pp. 879–892.41. Bansal, N. K., Mathur, R., and Bhandari, M. S., ‘A study of solar chimney assisted wind tower systems for natural ventilation in buildings’, Building & Environment, no. 29, 1994, pp. 495–500.42. Khan, N., Su, Y., and Riffat, S. B., ‘A review on wind driven ventilation techniques’, Energy and Buildings, no. 40, 2008, pp. 1586–1604.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,272
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,073

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle