MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053443659 · doi:10.1080/15265161.2012.671897

Juvenile Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Social Justice: An Imperative to Broaden the Discussion

2012· letter· en· W2053443659 on OpenAlexaff
G. K. D. Crozier, Brandon Michaud

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2012
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvarian tissueJuvenileCryopreservationSocial justiceEconomic JusticeEngineering ethicsCriminologyPsychologyPolitical scienceMedicineBiologyOvaryLawInternal medicineCell biologyEmbryoGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While “Preserving the Right to Future Children” presents a fair and systematic evaluation of the narrow question of whether Ms. Jones was justified in her decision to have ovarian tissue cryopreser...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.018
Scholarly communication0.0100.013
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.1490.120
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207