MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053459795 · doi:10.1159/000231355

Effect of T-Cell Depletion on the Growth of BCG in the Mouse Footpad

2009· article· en· W2053459795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frank M. Collins, L K Auclair, V. Montalbine

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune responses and vaccinations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunologySpleenLymph nodeTuberculinMycobacterium bovisT cellImmune systemImmunityTuberculosisPopulationMedicineLymphLymphatic systemBiologyMycobacterium tuberculosisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growth of Mycobacterium bovis (BCG Montreal) and M. tuberculosis Erdman was determined in normal and T-cell depleted (THXB) mice when injected subcutaneously into a hind footpad. The bacilli multiplied only to a limited extent within the footpad itself but the infection quickly spread to the draining popliteal lymph node to eventually reach the liver, spleen and lung. The amount of systemic growth seen in the THXB mice was 10-100 times greater than in the normal controls, all of which developed a tuberculin hypersensitivity and an immune response in 14-18 days. T-cell depletion completely inhibited the expression of tuberculin sensitivity by the infected host as well as ablating the antituberculous response against both the vaccinating BCG population and a superinfecting Erdman challenge inoculum. Incorporation studies in the THXB mice indicated a striking reduction in cell division within the draining lymph node but there was an unexpected elevation in the level of incorporation by the lung cells as the BCG infection progressed. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to the possible use of the BCG footpad model for studies of leprosy immunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.183
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied ImmunologySame topicImmune responses and vaccinationsFrench-language works237,207