MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2053470703 · doi:10.1029/2002jd002888

Radical chemistry at a forested continental site: Results from the PROPHET 1997 campaign

2003· article· en· W2053470703 on OpenAlexaff
C. M. Mihele, D. R. Hastie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsopreneNoonRadicalAtmospheric chemistryDiurnal temperature variationEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesPhotodissociationDaytimeOzoneOzone depletionHydroxyl radicalPhotochemistryChemistryEnvironmental chemistryMeteorologyGeologyOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radical chemistry at a forested site in northern Michigan has been examined using measurements made by a radical amplifier system in the summer of 1997. The radicals show a diurnal variation with the maximum concentration being measured several hours after solar noon. Low but observable concentrations were present at night, but these levels are inconsistent with the previously postulated active nighttime chemistry driven by high concentrations of highly reactive hydrocarbons. A box model, constrained by measured concentrations of CO, O3, NO, NO2, isoprene, and peroxyacetylnitrate, was found to simulate both the maximum concentrations and their diurnal variation. Model sensitivity studies indicate that 54% of the radical production comes from sources other than ozone photolysis, and the presence of isoprene has an impact on the radical concentration through impacts on both radical production and loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→