MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053474379 · doi:10.1109/iscc.2014.6912597

Energy-aware resource selection on opportunistic grids

2014· article· en· W2053474379 on OpenAlexaff
Izaias de Faria, Mário A. R. Dantas, Miriam A. M. Capretz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy consumptionComputer scienceResource (disambiguation)Consumption (sociology)Node (physics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Distributed computingEnergy (signal processing)Selection algorithmEfficient energy useResource consumptionReliability engineeringComputer networkEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy consumption has been a constant concern for high-performance computing (HPC). Recently, this concern has gained attention from the research community, which is aiming to reduce its costs. The performance gain in such an environment is usually proportional to cost. Examples of such environments are computational grids, which are used in the academic and enterprise domains. On the other hand, one way of obtaining high-performance computing with low-cost investment is by using opportunistic grids, which have become a viable alternative to super-computers and dedicated clusters. This paper proposes an energy-aware resource-selection algorithm to reduce energy consumption in opportunistic grids. The proposed algorithm takes into consideration resource status as well as actions to be taken before allocation to calculate energy consumption. Experimental analysis conducted in this study, taking into account network traffic and node status, shows that a more efficient resource-selection outcome can be obtained, leading to reduced energy consumption. Tests demonstrate an energy-consumption reduction of around 9.5% compared to a commonly used approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207