MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053477035 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.212302

Measurement of the Kaonic Hydrogen X-Ray Spectrum

2005· article· en· W2053477035 on OpenAlexaff
G. Beer, A.M. Bragadireanu, M. Cargnelli, C. Curceanu-Petrascu, J.‐P. Egger, H. Fuhrmann, C. Guaraldo, M. Iliescu, T. Ishiwatari, K. Itahashi, M. Iwasaki, P. Kienle, T. Koike, B. Lauss, V. Lucherini, L. Ludhová, J. Márton, F. Mulhauser, T. Ponta, L. A. Schaller, R. Seki, D. Sirghi, F. Sirghi, J. Zmeskal

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsHydrogenHydrogen atomEnergy spectrumGamma rayGround stateExotic atomNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The DEAR (DA$\ensuremath{\Phi}$NE exotic atom research) experiment measured the energy of x rays emitted in the transitions to the ground state of kaonic hydrogen. The measured values for the shift $ϵ$ and the width $\ensuremath{\Gamma}$ of the 1$s$ state due to the ${K}^{\ensuremath{-}}p$ strong interaction are ${ϵ}_{1s}=\ensuremath{-}193\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}37$ (stat) $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}6$ (syst) eV and ${\ensuremath{\Gamma}}_{1s}=249\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}111$ (stat) $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}30$ (syst) eV, the most precise values yet obtained. The pattern of the kaonic hydrogen $K$-series lines, ${K}_{\ensuremath{\alpha}}$, ${K}_{\ensuremath{\beta}}$, and ${K}_{\ensuremath{\gamma}}$, was disentangled for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations248
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207