MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

New approximate formulae for radiative accelerations in stars

2002· article· en· W2053480642 on OpenAlexaff
G. Alecian, F. Leblanc

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsOpacityRadiative transferStarsAstrophysicsComputationParametric statisticsComputational physicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiative accelerations are quantities that are crucial in the study of diffusion processes in stars. Their calculation requires the use of large atomic and opacity data bases, and generally necessitates very heavy numerical computations. New approximate formulae for radiative accelerations in stars, arising from both bound–bound and bound–free transitions, are presented. These are written in a parametric form, which separate the terms depending on the local abundance of the element under consideration from those depending mainly on the atomic data. These formulae are shown to be significantly superior to those previously published. The main reason for this improvement comes form the use of monochromatic opacities instead of approximating these by the Rosseland mean. The principal advantage for the use of these parametric equations over other methods for calculating radiative accelerations is its numerical expediency. Results are shown for several elements (C, Ar, Ca and Fe) in a type A star.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→