MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053496516 · doi:10.1080/14685240802272117

Dual vortex structure shedding from low aspect ratio, surface-mounted pyramids

2008· article· en· W2053496516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Turbulence · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Newcastle Australia
KeywordsVortex sheddingVortexTurbulenceDual (grammatical number)MechanicsSurface (topology)Aspect ratio (aeronautics)PhysicsMaterials scienceGeometryReynolds numberMathematicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow around surface-mounted, square-based pyramids, of apex angles ranging from 5° to 90°, placed in a thin boundary layer with one face normal to the on-coming flow was investigated for Reynolds numbers of 10 000–150 000 using surface pressure measurements and particle image velocimetry as well as oil-film surface-flow patterns. Based on the periodicity of the surface pressure on the pyramid side faces, four distinct shedding regimes were identified: constant local Strouhal number, discrete cellular, low aspect ratio and suppressed. Closer inspection of the low aspect ratio regime indicates that two distinct vortical structures are shed at the same frequency. Vortices are shed alternately from opposing faces in the obstacle base region, while hairpin vortices are shed in-phase and are most easily observed near the tip region of the pyramid. It is further shown that the existence of these structures is consistent with the mean surface-flow topology observed in the wake and side faces of the obstacles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it