Mechanical Ventilation Exacerbates Alveolar Macrophage Dysfunction in the Lungs of Ethanol-Fed Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with alcohol abuse have a two- to three-fold increased risk of acute lung injury and respiratory failure after sepsis or trauma but are also at increased risk of nosocomial pneumonia. Mechanical ventilation exacerbates lung injury during critical illnesses. In this study we tested whether mechanical ventilation of the alcoholic lung promotes on balance a proinflammatory phenotype favoring ventilator-induced lung injury or an immunosuppressive phenotype favoring ventilator-associated pneumonia. METHODS: Lungs from rats fed an isocaloric diet with or without ethanol (six weeks) were isolated and ventilated ex vivo with a low-volume (protective) or high-volume (injurious) strategy for two hours with or without prior endotoxemia (two hours). In other experiments, rats were subjected to high-volume ventilation in vivo. Airway levels of the proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha, macrophage inflammatory protein-2, and interleukin-1beta were determined after mechanical ventilation ex vivo and compared with edematous lung injury after high-volume ventilation in vivo. In parallel, alveolar macrophage phagocytosis of bacteria and secretion of interleukin-12 during ventilation ex vivo and endotoxin-stimulated alveolar macrophage phagocytosis and tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion in vitro were determined. RESULTS: Ethanol ingestion suppressed the proinflammatory response to injurious mechanical ventilation and did not increase experimental ventilator-induced lung injury. In parallel, ethanol ingestion blunted the innate immune response of alveolar macrophages during injurious ventilation ex vivo and after endotoxin stimulation in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol ingestion dampens ventilator-induced inflammation but exacerbates macrophage immune dysfunction. These findings could explain at least in part why alcoholic patients are at increased risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".