Flow patterns and oil—water dispersion in a 0.38 m diameter oscillatory baffled column
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report our experimental flow visualization observations of flow patterns and experimental oil‐water dispersion measurements in an oscillatory baffled column (OBC) of an internal diameter 380 mm. Both types of experiments were carried out covering an identical range of oscillation frequencies, amplitudes, orifice diameters and baffle spacings. The flow visualization observations show that eddy mixing has been achieved in the pilot OBC and the intensity of which is largely dependent on the operational and geometrical parameters tested, which is similar to that in a smaller scale OBC. The scale‐up correlation was found to be linear. The oil‐water dispersion measurements show that the degree of the dispersion depends significantly on the oscillation frequency and amplitude with an increase in either leading to an increase in dispersion. The effect of the orifice diameter on the oil—water dispersion is also evident, but the effect of the baffle spacing is much weaker. Based on the experimental data we have established a correlation relating the degree of oil—water dispersion to the power input to the system. We have also compared the power requirement to achieve a complete dispersion in the pilot OBC with that in a bench scale OBC of 50 mm diameter and found that the energy dissipation is more economical in the large scale application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".