Dermal Fibroblast Morphology is Affected by Stretching and not by C48/80
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both stretching and C48/80 have been hypothesized to cause disruption of cell-matrix adhesions and thereby affect the dynamics of fluid balance in tissues. We investigated the effect of sinusoidal stretching and/or C48/80 on the morphology of fibroblasts in skin excised from the backs of Wistar-Möller rats in order to assess how these stimuli affect cellular interactions in tissues. Tissue samples were either soaked in Krebs' buffer with and without C48/80, or sinusoidally stretched (20% strain) in buffer with and without C48/80. Control skin was fixed immediately after excision. All tissues were processed for transmission electron microscopy. Morphometric analyses demonstrated that sinusoidal stretching of the skin results in the retraction or disruption of fibroblast cytoplasmic extensions, rounding up of the cell bodies and subsequently in increased tissue water content. C48/80 had no apparent effect on fibroblast morphology and adherence in tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".