MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053564579 · doi:10.4171/ifb/86

On level-set approach to motion of manifolds of arbitrary codimension

2003· article· en· W2053564579 on OpenAlexaff
Dejan Slepčev

Bibliographic record

VenueInterfaces and Free Boundaries Mathematical Analysis Computation and Applications · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCodimensionLevel set (data structures)MathematicsMotion (physics)Set (abstract data type)Function (biology)Manifold (fluid mechanics)CurvatureMathematical analysisLevel set methodDifferential topologyZero (linguistics)Mean curvatureDifferential (mechanical device)Pure mathematicsGeometryComputer scienceRicci-flat manifoldPhysicsClassical mechanicsImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambrosio and Soner We investigate for what (other) normal velocities, and how, the level-set methods can be used to treat motion of manifolds of arbitrary codimension by the given velocity. Two variants of the level-set approach are studied. One uses the properties of the distance function to describe the motion. In the other one, the moving manifolds are represented as a zero-level set of a solution to a parabolic differential equation. Necessary conditions and sufficient conditions for these approaches to be applicable are given. The motion of curves in R n , by a velocity that is parallel to the normal vector, is studied in greater detail and the velocities to which the level-set methods apply are partially classified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterfaces and Free Boundaries Mathematical Analysis Computation and ApplicationsSame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207