MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053575412 · doi:10.1159/000064075

Expression in Mouse Kidney of Membrane Copper Transporters Atp7a and Atp7b

2002· article· en· W2053575412 on OpenAlexafffund
Steven D.P. Moore, Diane W. Cox

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Liver Foundation
KeywordsATP7AMenkes diseaseCopper deficiencyReabsorptionCopperKidneyBiologyHomeostasisInternal medicineEndocrinologyATPaseCell biologyBiochemistryChemistryMedicineEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copper is essential for activity of many enzymes, but is toxic in excess. Several copper proteins are required for copper homeostasis. ATP7A and ATP7B are genes encoding membrane copper transporters. ATP7A, defective in Menkes disease (MNK), is expressed in many tissues involved primarily in copper uptake from dietary sources. ATP7B, defective in Wilson disease (WND), is essential for copper excretion. Although MNK patients have a copper deficiency in most tissues, copper accumulates in proximal tubules in the kidney. WND patients also have copper accumulation in the proximal tubules. In some WND patients this copper accumulation may result in tubular dysfunction, resulting in the increased excretion of low molecular weight substances (e.g. amino acids and calcium). In mouse, we have demonstrated, by in situ hybridization, the expression pattern in the kidney of mouse orthologues, Atp7a and Atp7b, and have confirmed Atp7b expression by immunohistochemistry. Both Atp7a and Atp7b are expressed in glomeruli; however, Atp7b is also seen in the kidney medulla. This suggests that glomeruli are responsible for regulating copper levels in the filtrate. In WND patients, urinary copper levels are extremely high suggesting Atp7b in the loops of Henle may have a role in copper reabsorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207