Electrochemical performance of a fluidized bed electrode fuel cell with molten carbonate electrolyte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) has been extensively studied and vigorously developed. However, the shortage in gas‐diffusion electrode limits its widely application to a large extent. Fluidized bed electrode (FBE) has been paid more and more attention all around the world due to its high mass and heat transfer coefficient. In this study, a novel fuel cell combined MCFC and FBE is proposed, which is called fluidized bed electrode fuel cell (FBEFC). Its polarization characteristics are fundamentally investigated under various experimental conditions. The optimal performance of the FBEFC is obtained under the following conditions with an open circuit voltage of 0.987 V and a peak power density of 39.6 mW cm −2 : electrolyte composition, 62 % Li 2 CO 3 : 38 % K 2 CO 3 ; O 2 /CO 2 ratio, 1/2; reaction temperature, 923 K; anode gas flow rate, 402 ml min −1 ; and cathode gas flow rate, 1723 ml min −1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".