La lecture littéraire comme parcours dans l’aire du dire : prolégomènes à une sémiotique de la réception
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Questionnant le caractère singulier qu’on suppose à la lecture littéraire, le présent article vise à explorer les points de convergence entre la réflexion sur la réception et la réflexion sur la sémiotique. Au prix d’une mise en rapport patiente des concepts, semble-t-il voisins, de paradigme chez Kuhn et de jeu de langage chez Wittgenstein, on en vient à poser les pratiques sémiotiques comme véhiculant des manières de voir implicites qui ouvrent, en le délimitant, un espace de discours et d’action. La singularité des hypothèses de lecture est ainsi repensée au sein de cette conception particulière, et une certaine sémiotique semble, du coup, à même de fournir un cadre heuristique pour l’étude de la réception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".