Structural and mechanical features of some lanthanum tellurite glasses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tellurite-based glasses of the chemical formula xLa2O3-(100 – x) TeO2, (2.5 ≤ x ≤ 12.5 mol%) have been prepared and studied by FTIR spectroscopy and the ultrasonic technique. The FTIR analysis indicated that La2O3 transformed the TeO3 into TeO4 structural units in the range 2.5 ≤ x ≤ 5, while in the range 5 ≤ x ≤ 7.5 mol%; there is a coordination transformation of Te atoms in [TeO4] groups into [Formula: see text] groups associated with the formation of non-bridging oxygens. Beyond x = 7.5 mol%, the structural units [Formula: see text] (tp) were destroyed and transformed into TeO4 structural units that acted as a former and tightened the tellurite glass network more. The stretching force constant of the tellurite structural units was affected with the increase of La2O3 content. The structural variations of the structural units of TeO2 and La2O3 affected the increase of density, the behaviour of the ultrasonic velocities, the elastic moduli, and both of the optical and acoustical Debye temperature with increasing La2O3 content. The ratio of optical to acoustic Debye temperature represented the three-dimensional nature of tellurite-based glasses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".