MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053619357 · doi:10.1353/utq.2011.0063

Tropes and Territories: Short Fiction, Postcolonial Readings, Canadian Writings in Context (review)

2011· article· en· W2053619357 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Judith Leggatt

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)HistoryCanadian literatureCriticismLiteratureFocus (optics)Art historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Tropes and Territories: Short Fiction, Postcolonial Readings, Canadian Writings in Context Judith Leggatt (bio) Marta Dvorák and W.H. New, editors. Tropes and Territories: Short Fiction, Postcolonial Readings, Canadian Writings in Context. McGill-Queens University Press. 2007. 384. $80.00 This collection of essays springs from a conference at the Sorbonne in April 2005, but it is more than a volume of conference proceedings. Although the title might lead one to expect a focus on Canadian short stories, the collection instead provides ways of looking at short fiction from around the postcolonial world. While about half the essays do focus on Canadian short fiction by the usual suspects - there are at least two essays on each of Alice Munro, Mavis Gallant, Alastair Macleod, and Rohinton Mistry - there are also essays dealing with short fiction in India, Australia, the Caribbean, and New Zealand. The last gets particular emphasis, with the second greatest number of essays. The interrelationships between form and cultural location are at the heart of the anthology and link together the different essays, showing how shape and place - the tropes and territories of the title - depend on each other. The editors' suggestion that the short story and postcolonial writing are linked since 'both are seen as peripheral' stretches the connection a little, but the focus on a single genre does allow the collection to foreground current debates about form and genre within postcolonial criticism. The anthology opens with essays by Laura Moss and Diana Brydon that provide a larger theoretical context for the readings of specific texts that follow. Moss questions the limitations of the 'mandated political perspective' of postcolonial criticism, that of reading ethnicity and cultural heritage at the cost of other political or formal frameworks. She argues that such readings shut down interpretation and cast an author 'more as a cultural informant than an artist.' Brydon reads stories and identity with the context of globalization, examining the connections and disjunctions between ideas of home, story, and truth, and complicating and developing the reading practices that so trouble Moss. The two essays both point to a dissatisfaction with and improvement on the received reading practices of the postcolonial criticism of the twentieth century, and the essays of the collection all struggle to recast those practices in a variety of ways. One central question is the interrelationship of European short story conventions and traditional storytelling techniques from a variety of cultures in informing the style and structure of postcolonial short stories. [End Page 334] One side of this debate is exemplified in Warren Cariou's discussion of the specifically Metis form of Maria Campbell's Stories of the Road Allowance People, in which he argues that Campbell, like the titular character of 'Jacob,' uses 'print as a medium through which oral ways of knowing can be preserved and expressed'; the other is perhaps best summed up by Gerald Lynch's surprising reading of Thomas King's Medicine River as more influenced by Stephen Leacock's Sunshine Sketches of a Little Town than by First Nations oral traditions. The tension between these two readings is mitigated by Cariou's and Lynch's separate acknowledgements of the presence of both oral and written traditions in the story cycles; both also acknowledge similarities between the two seemingly oppositional traditions. In the introduction, Dvorák and New point to a reluctance throughout the collection to treat 'the methods and effects of postmodern storytelling' and 'the conventions of traditional storytelling in oral' as 'simply oppositional binaries.' For example, Isabel Carrera Suárez examines the play between oral and epistolary traditions in Caribbean women's poetry, and Mark Williams shows how Witi Ihimaera uses Maori sensibility in his rewritings of Katherine Mansfied's stories in order to demonstrate the differences between Maori and Pakeha understandings of biculturalism in New Zealand. The essays in the collection speak to each other and open debates about the role of criticism in connecting history and place with the specific use of language and genre, about the tensions between individual authors or texts and larger cultural contexts, and about the opposing pulls of nationalist pasts and global futures. It is recommended reading for scholars of Canadian or...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.018
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlySame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207