Parametric study of truss bridges by the post-tensioning method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The post-tensioning method has been successfully used to improve the performance of existing concrete structures. Applications of the method are rare in steel structures, however. Post-tensioning using high-strength cables or bars can be effectively used to increase the working load carrying capacity of steel structures. In this paper, the elastic behavior of post-tensioned trusses with straight and draped tendon profiles for truss strengthening is examined. The effects of design parameters such as the tendon profile, truss type, prestressing force, and tendon eccentricity on working load and deflection of trusses are studied. The results show that the allowable load of a truss increases proportionally with the increase in prestressing force and eccentricity. Post-tensioning enlarges the elastic range, increases the redundancy, and reduces the deflection and member stresses, eventually increasing the load-carrying capacity of truss bridges.Key words: post-tensioning method, steel structures, post-tensioned trusses, truss strengthening, design parameters, load-carrying capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it