Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cranberry is an important dry bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) market class grown in the United States and Canada. Beet curly top virus (BCTV) plagues cranberry bean production in the western United States (California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington). ‘Krimson’ (Reg. No. CV‐300, PI 663911) cranberry bean, released by the USDA‐ARS in 2009, was bred for a high level of resistance to BCTV. Krimson possesses the Bct gene, which confers resistance to BCTV, as indicated by presence of the SAS8.1550 sequence characterized amplified region marker, which is tightly linked with the gene. Greenhouse inoculation tests with the NL‐3 strain of Bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV) revealed presence of the I gene, which conditions resistance to Bean common mosaic virus and a hypersensitive response to BCMNV. Intermediate resistance to rust [caused by Uromyces appendiculatus (Pers.:Pers) Unger] will benefit production east of the Continental Divide. Krimson was also bred for wide adaptation and enhanced yield potential, which is evidenced by an average yield of 2487 kg ha −1 compared with 2310 kg ha −1 for the check ‘Capri’ across 21 location‐years in the Cooperative Dry Bean Nursery. Maturity (3 d earlier than Capri), seed size (same as Capri), and seed appearance and canning quality traits (slightly less desirable than those of Capri) for Krimson were within the desired range for the cranberry dry bean market class. Krimson is suitable for commercial production across the United States, but with the additional benefit of virus resistance for commercial and seed production in the western United States.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".