MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053628678 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2001-015-6

<i>R</i>-Diagonal Elements and Freeness With Amalgamation

2001· article· en· W2053628678 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandru Nica, Dimitri Shlyakhtenko, Roland Speicher

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCanadian Mathematical SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDiagonalMathematicsClass (philosophy)Element (criminal law)Pure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldGeometryArtificial intelligenceLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The concept of R-diagonal element was introduced in [5], and was subsequently found to have applications to several problems in free probability. In this paper we describe a new approach to R-diagonality, which relies on freeness with amalgamation. The class of R-diagonal elements is enlarged to contain examples living in non-tracial *-probability spaces, such as the generalized circular elements of [7].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Algebra and LogicFrench-language works237,207