MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053666185 · doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.03.040

Right pulmonary artery transection following blunt chest trauma

2010· article· en· W2053666185 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-François Vendrell, G. Gahide

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma Management and Diagnosis
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBluntMedicinePulmonary arteryRight pulmonary arteryCardiologyInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 42-year-old woman was referred to our institution after blunt chest trauma. Thoracic computed tomography scan showed a transection of the right pulmonary artery with pseudo-aneurysm formation (Fig. 1 ). Considering associated cerebral, lumbar and digestive lesions and haemodynamic stability without haemothorax, surgical management was not decided. Thoracic CT scan performed at the acute phase showed a pseudo-aneurysm arising from the right pulmonary artery (arrows) with intimal flap into the arterial lumen (arrowheads). (A) Transverse view, (B) sagittal view, and (C) three-dimensional reconstruction of the pulmonary artery. Spontaneous reduction in size of the pseudo-aneurysm was observed on the control CT scan performed 14 days later. (D) Transverse view. Considering the good clinical outcome of the patient, the spontaneous reduction in size of the pseudo-aneurysm and the major surgical risks, therapeutic abstention was decided. The patient was discharged at 1 month and managed in a physical therapy department (patient’s consent was obtained).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgerySame topicTrauma Management and DiagnosisFrench-language works237,207