MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053678450 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100008696

Deducing the Bioactive Face of Hydantoin Anticonvulsant Drugs Using NMR Spectroscopy

2008· article· en· W2053678450 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Kathryn E. Tiedje, Donald F. Weaver

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health Research FoundationDalhousie Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsHydantoinPharmacophoreChemistryRing (chemistry)AmideStereochemistrySubstituentNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyConformational isomerismMoleculeOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The general purpose of this study was to deduce the geometry of the bioactive face (pharmacophore) for the hydantoin class of anticonvulsants. METHODS: Six hydantoin analogs, selected as probes of hydantoin structure, were synthesized. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and molecular modelling calculations were used to determine the geometric relationship between the aromatic group and the amide group in the hydantoin pharmacophore. RESULTS: In accord with both theoretical and experimental results, the biologically inactive hydantoin analogs containing a benzyl substituent existed in a folded conformation with the benzene flopped over the hydantoin ring. Conversely the biologically active hydantoins had a phenyl ring extended away from the hydantoin ring. CONCLUSIONS: The bioactive face for hydantoins consists of a N(H)-C(=O)-X-phenyl molecular fragment, where X is a carbon or nitrogen atom and where the distance between the centre of the amide bond and the centroid of the phenyl ring is 4.3 A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207