MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053706989 · doi:10.1118/1.598881

A virtual source model for Monte Carlo modeling of arbitrary intensity distributions

2000· article· en· W2053706989 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Indrin J. Chetty, John J. DeMarco, Timothy D. Solberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodPhysicsLinear particle acceleratorPhotonFluenceComputational physicsOpticsBeam (structure)Monte Carlo method for photon transportScatteringPhoton energyDynamic Monte Carlo methodMathematicsStatisticsDirect simulation Monte Carlo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A photon virtual source model was developed for simulating arbitrary, external beam, intensity distributions using the Monte Carlo method. The source model consists of a photon fluence grid composed of a matrix of square elements, located 25-cm downstream from the linear accelerator target. Each particle originating from the fluence map is characterized by the seven phase space parameters, position (x, y, z), direction (u, v, w), and energy. The map was reconstructed from fluence and energy spectra acquired by modeling components of the linear accelerator treatment head using the Monte Carlo code MCNP4B. The effect of contaminant electrons is accounted for by the use of a sub-source derived from a phase-space simulation of a 25-MV linac treatment head using the code BEAM. The BEAM sub-source was incorporated into the MCNP4B phase-space model and is sampled using a field-size dependent sampling ratio. A Gaussian blurring kernel is convolved with the photon fluence map to account for the finite focal spot size and scattering effects from structures such as the flattening filter and MLC leaves. Depth dose and profile source calculations for 6-MV and 25-MV photon beams, for 5 x 5 cm2, 10 x 10 cm2, and 15 x 15 cm2 field sizes, are in good agreement with measurement and are well within acceptability criteria suggested by the AAPM Task Group Report No. 53. Irregular field calculations compared with film measurement and with a 3-D pencil beam algorithm show that the source model is capable of accurately simulating arbitrary MLC fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207