MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053707096 · doi:10.1002/app.24230

Modification of high‐performance polymer composite through high‐energy radiation and low‐pressure plasma for aerospace and space applications

2006· article· en· W2053707096 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolymerComposite materialEpoxyAdhesiveComposite numberPlasmaUltimate tensile strengthNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this investigation, attempts are made to modify a high‐performance polymer such as polybenzimidazole (PBI) (service temperature ranges from −260°C to +400°C) through high‐energy radiation and low‐pressure plasma to prepare composite with the same polymer. The PBI composites are prepared using an ultrahigh temperature resistant epoxy adhesive to join the two polymer sheets. The service temperature of this adhesive ranges from −260°C to +370°C, and in addition, this adhesive has excellent resistance to most acids, alkalis, solvents, corrosive agents, radiation, and fire, making it extremely useful for aerospace and space applications. Prior to preparing the composite, the surface of the PBI is ultrasonically cleaned by acetone followed by its modification through high‐energy radiation for 6 h in the pool of a SLOWPOKE‐2 (safe low power critical experiment) nuclear reactor, which produces a mixed field of thermal and epithermal neutrons, energetic electrons, and protons, and γ‐rays, with a dose rate of 37 kGy/h and low‐pressure plasma through 13.56 MHz RF glow discharge for 120 s at 100 W of power using nitrogen as process gas, to essentially increase the surface energy of the polymer, leading to substantial improvement of its adhesion characteristics. Prior to joining, the polymer surfaces are characterized by estimating surface energy and electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA). To determine the joint strength, tensile lap shear tests are performed according to ASTM D 5868–95 standard. Another set of experiments is carried out by exposing the low‐pressure plasma‐modified polymer joint under the SLOWPOKE‐2 nuclear for 6 h. Considerable increase in the joint strength is observed, when the polymer surface is modified by either high‐energy radiation or low‐pressure plasma. There is further significant increase in joint strength, when the polymer surface is first modified by low‐pressure plasma followed by exposing the joint under high‐energy radiation. To simulate with spatial conditions, the joints are exposed to cryogenic (−196°C) and high temperatures (+300°C) for 100 h. Then, tensile lap shear tests are carried out to determine the effects of these environments on the joint strength. It is observed that when these polymeric joints are exposed to these climatic conditions, the joints could retain their strength of about 95% of that of joints tested under ambient conditions. Finally, to understand the behavior of ultrahigh temperature resistant epoxy adhesive bonding of PBI, the fractured surfaces of the joints are examined by scanning electron microscope. It is observed that there is considerable interfacial failure in the case of unmodified polymer‐to‐polymer joint whereas surface‐modified polymer essentially fails cohesively within the adhesive. Therefore, this high‐performance polymer composite could be highly useful for structural applications in space and aerospace. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 1959–1967, 2006

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it