Resolving Composition and Structure of <i>RE</i>–Sb–O–C Natural Superlattice Phases (<i>RE </i>= La, Ho)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A family of rare earth antimonide oxycarbides have been prepared and structurally characterized. These superlattice phases are constructed from NaCl‐type RE Sb slabs sandwiched between RE –O–C layers. Depending on the carbon content and synthetic conditions, three different RE –Sb–O–C structures can be obtained. At lower temperatures, RE 9– δ Sb 5 (O,C) 5 phases are obtained for RE = La, Ho. These phases adopt a stuffed Sc 2 Sb‐type structure with P 4/ nmm symmetry. An O/C mixture, in which the O/C ratio is larger than 4:1, is randomly distributed within the RE –O–C layers. The RE atoms are highly disordered within the oxide layer. At temperatures above the melting point of the samples, RE 9 Sb 5 O 4 C phases with P 4/ n symmetry are produced. The RE –O–C layers in RE 9 Sb 5 O 4 are fully ordered; the RE sites are well defined, and the O and C atoms occupy the tetrahedral and square‐pyramidal voids, respectively. At high temperatures, a new ordered La 14 Sb 8 O 7 C structure with P 4 bm symmetry was discovered. The La 14 Sb 8 O 7 C phase is structurally similar to RE 9 Sb 5 O 4 C and features orderedarrangements of La and O/C atoms in the La–O–C layer. The RE 9– δ Sb 5 (O,C) 5 , RE 9 Sb 5 O 4 C and La 14 Sb 8 O 7 C phases appear to be charge‐balanced, and their compositions and structures are controlled by the O/C ratio. Parallel preparative experiments revealed the importance of carbon in the formation of these layered phases. In addition, it has been established that the purity of the rare earth metals influences the compositions and structures of the products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".