MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053732071 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m008320200

Fragile T-stem in Disease-associated Human Mitochondrial tRNA Sensitizes Structure to Local and Distant Mutations

2001· article· en· W2053732071 on OpenAlexafffund
Shana O. Kelley, Sergey V. Steinberg, Paul Schimmel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of General Medical SciencesMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsAminoacylationTransfer RNABiologyMutantGeneticsMutationMitochondrionMitochondrial diseaseMitochondrial DNARNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations in human mitochondrial isoleucine tRNA (hs mt tRNA(Ile)) are associated with cardiomyopathy and opthalmoplegia. A recent study showed that opthalmoplegia-related mutations gave rise to severe decreases in aminoacylation efficiencies and that the defective mutant tRNAs were effective inhibitors of aminoacylation of the wild-type substrate. The results suggested that the effectiveness of the mutations was due in large part to an inherently fragile mitochondrial tRNA structure. Here, we investigate mutant tRNAs associated with cardiomyopathy, and a series of rationally designed second-site substitutions introduced into both opthalmoplegia- and cardiomyopathy-related mutant tRNAs. A source of structural fragility was uncovered. An inherently unstable T-stem appears susceptible to misalignments. This susceptibility sensitizes both domains of the L-shaped tRNA structure to base substitutions that are deleterious. Thus, the fragile T-stem makes the structure of this human mitochondrial tRNA particularly vulnerable to local and distant mutations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207