MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053742886 · doi:10.1145/2713168.2713179

Dynamic configuration of single frequency networks in mobile streaming systems

2015· article· en· W2053742886 on OpenAlexaff
Saleh Almowuena, Mohamed Hefeeda

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUnicastComputer networkMulticastWireless networkMulti-frequency networkBandwidth (computing)WirelessCellular networkDistributed computingHeterogeneous networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the capacity of cellular networks has increased with recent generations, the growth in demand of wireless bandwidth has outpaced this increase in capacity. Not only more users are relying on wireless networks, but also the demand from each user has substantially increased. For example, it has become common for mobile users to stream full TV episodes, sports events, and movies while on the go. Further, as the capabilities of mobile devices improve, the demand for higher quality and even 3D videos will escalate, which will strain cellular networks. Therefore, efficient utilization of the expensive and limited wireless spectrum remains an important problem, especially in the context of multimedia streaming services that consume a large portion of the wireless capacity. In this paper, we introduce the idea of dynamically configuring cells in wireless networks to form single frequency networks based on the multimedia traffic demands from users in each cell. We formulate the resource allocation problem in such complex networks with the goal of maximizing the number of served multimedia streams. We prove that this problem is NP-Complete, and we propose a heuristic algorithm to solve it. Through detailed packet-level simulations, we show that the proposed algorithm can achieve substantial improvements in the number of streams served as well the energy saving of mobile devices. For example, our algorithm can serve up to 40 times more users compared to the common unicast streaming approach, and it achieves at least 80% and up to 400% improvement compared to multicast approaches that do not use single frequency networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207