MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053759788 · doi:10.2118/79695-ms

Coupled Simulation of Reservoir Flow, Geomechanics, and Formation Plugging With Application to High-Rate Produced Water Reinjection

2003· article· en· W2053759788 on OpenAlexaff
R. C. Bachman, Thomas G. Harding, A. Settari, D. A. Walters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeomechanicsPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringInjectorFracture (geology)Water injection (oil production)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringFlow (mathematics)Pore water pressureVolumetric flow rateMechanicsEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Produced water re-injection at high rates presents a coupled problem of reservoir flow, formation damage, stress alteration around the injector, and fracture propagation. Accurate prediction of permeability changes, fracture propagation pressure, and fracture dimensions is required for minimization of disposal costs and design of surface equipment. The paper presents the formulation and numerical implementation of a coupled reservoir, damage and geomechanical model which includes the above couplings. Details of the model are first described. A simple empirical damage model, calibrated to field data is then presented. Finally, application of the complete model to high rate reinjection in the Masila Block in Yemen is presented. The model predictions show that it is feasible to sustain over 100,000 BWPD in a single Masila disposal well by injecting above fracture pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207