MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053802531 · doi:10.4161/cc.3.8.1075

Oxygen Sensing by H+: Implications for HIF and Hypoxic Cell Memory

2004· article· en· W2053802531 on OpenAlexaff
Karim Mekhail, Mireille Khacho, Lakshman Gunaratnam, Stephen Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHypoxia (environmental)Oxygen tensionCell biologyHypoxia-inducible factorsHomeostasisTranscription factorOxygenExtracellularBiochemistryGeneChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypoxia and acidosis are common features of several physiological and pathological situations, including cancer and stroke. The HIF (hypoxia-inducible factor) transcription factor plays a seminal role in orchestrating cellular responses to alterations in oxygen availability. HIF is degraded in normal oxygen tension by the VHL (von Hippel-Lindau) tumor suppressor protein but stabilized by hypoxia to activate an array of genes implicated in oxygen homeostasis including vascular endothelial growth factor. Cells respond to a comparatively mild decline in oxygen tension by converting to an anaerobic state of respiration and secreting lactic acid. We recently reported that a decrease in environmental pH triggers sequestration of VHL into the nucleolus neutralizing its ability to degrade HIF. This implies that cells have evolved a parallel mechanism of HIF activation that responds to changes in oxygen levels by sensing extracellular [H+]. Here we discuss the implications of this new VHL regulatory mechanism on oxygen homeostasis and hypoxic cell memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207