MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053802558 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2011.2126049

Novel Transmission Line Modeling Method for Nonlinear Permeance Network Based Simulation of Induction Machines

2011· article· en· W2053802558 on OpenAlexafffund
Babak Asghari, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPermeanceNonlinear systemComputer scienceTransmission lineIterative methodRotor (electric)Induction motorNewton's methodFinite element methodControl theory (sociology)Electric power transmissionLine (geometry)AlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringVoltagePhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies different iterative solution methods for nonlinear permeance network based machine models. A new transmission line modeling (TLM) algorithm for efficient solution of permeance network models (PNM) of induction machines is proposed. In this method, the TLM algorithm is used to decouple the nonlinear magnetic equations. The decoupled nonlinear equations are then solved by a look-up table method owing to the repetitive nature of equations across the geometry of the machine. It is shown that the proposed method offers significant speed-up compared to the conventional Newton-Raphson method. Simulation results for dynamic and steady-state conditions of a closed rotor slot induction motor are compared with experimental test results as well as finite element analysis to evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207