MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053804962 · doi:10.1021/jp0573644

Monte Carlo Simulation of Exciton Bimolecular Annihilation Dynamics in Supramolecular Semiconductor Architectures

2007· article· en· W2053804962 on OpenAlexaff
Clément Daniel, Sebastian Westenhoff, François Makereel, Richard H. Friend, David Beljonne, Laura M. Herz, Carlos Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnnihilationExcitonChemical physicsExcitationExcited statePhotoluminescenceMolecular physicsPicosecondMonte Carlo methodSupramolecular chemistryChemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsMoleculeOptoelectronicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a simulation of exciton dynamics in supramolecular assemblies of an oligo- p -phenylenevinylene derivative monofunctionalised with a quadruple hydrogen-bonding group (MOPV). MOPV molecules form helical stacks in dodecane solution through solvophobic and π−π interactions with thermotropic reversibility. We apply a model of incoherent excitation hopping using a Monte Carlo scheme to extract microscopic physical quantities relevant to energy diffusion and bimolecular annihilation processes within isolated nanostructures. We compare the simulation to ultrafast spectroscopic data, namely photoinduced absorption transients at various excitation fluences, their polarization anisotropy, and the dynamic photoluminescence red-shift. We observe that energy diffusion and bimolecular annihilation processes can be described with the same microscopic model based on a Förster-like model that takes into account the spatial extent of the excited state; these two processes are interconnected via the same underlying physics. We extract a high diffusion coefficient (∼0.08 cm 2 s -1 ) over the first few picoseconds following excitation, which plays an important role in dictating the bimolecular annihilation dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207