MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053805165 · doi:10.1049/el.2012.1150

Low-power design technique for decision-feedback equalisation in serial links

2012· article· en· W2053805165 on OpenAlexaff
Arash Zargaran-Yazd, Shahriar Mirabbasi

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEqualiserGigabitPower (physics)CMOSElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEqualizerFeedback loopSerial communicationEngineeringComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A design technique for performing low-power decision-feedback equalisation for multi-Gbit/s serial links is presented. The technique systematically reduces the capacitive loading on the timing-critical node within the feedback loop of the equaliser. Based on the proposed technique, an architecture capable of both equalisation and digitisation of the received data is presented. Power efficiency of the proposed architecture is analysed and is compared with that of conventional analogue and loop-unrolled decision-feedback equalisers. The technique is validated through a proof-of-concept chip fabricated in 65 nm CMOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207