MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053840607 · doi:10.1115/fedsm-icnmm2010-30047

Parameter Estimation of a Fluttering Aeroelastic System in the Transitional Reynolds Number Regime

2010· article· en· W2053840607 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Khalil, Abhijit Sarkar, Dominique Poirel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWind tunnelAeroelasticityReynolds numberControl theory (sociology)AerodynamicsNonlinear systemMathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceMechanicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the parameter estimation results of a self-sustaining aeroelastic oscillator. The system is composed of a rigid wing that is elastically mounted on a rig, which in turn is fixed in a wind tunnel. For certain flow conditions, in particular dictated by the Reynolds number in the transitional regime, the wing extracts energy from the flow leading to a stable limit cycle oscillation. The basic physical mechanism at the origin of the oscillations is laminar boundary layer separation, which leads to negative aerodynamic damping. An empirical model of the aeroelastic system is proposed in the form of a generalized Duffing-van der Pol oscillator, whereby the linear and nonlinear aeroelastic terms are unknowns to be estimated. The model (input) noise process accounting for the amplitude modulation observed from experiments will also be estimated. We apply a Bayesian inference based batch data assimilation method in tackling this strongly nonlinear and non-Gaussian model. In particular, Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling technique is used to generate samples from the joint distribution of the unknown parameters given noisy measurement data. The extended Kalman filter is utilized to obtain the conditional distribution of the model state given the noisy measurements. The parameter estimates for a third order generalized Duffing-van der Pol oscillator are obtained and marginal and joint probability density functions for the parameters will be presented for both a numerical model and a rigid wing that is elastically mounted on a rig in a wind tunnel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207