MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053863335 · doi:10.1186/cc5439

Prehospital echocardiography in pulseless electrical activity victims using portable, handheld ultrasound

2007· article· en· W2053863335 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christian Byhahn, E. Müller, Felix Walcher, Holger Steiger, Florian Seeger, Raoul Breitkreutz

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicinePulseless electrical activityCardiologyMedical emergencyInternal medicineEmergency medicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Potentially treatable causes of sudden cardiac arrest, such as pericardial tamponade, myocardial insufficiency or hypovolemia, should be identified as soon as possible (that is, at the scene). Although these diagnoses are mainly made by echocardiography, old and new ERC or ILCOR guidelines only recommend pauses of ventilation or chest compressions as 'brief interruptions' at a maximum of 10 seconds, thereby potentially limiting transthoracic ultrasound examinations. We introduced an ALS-based algorithm of focused echocardiographic evaluation during resuscitation (FEER) to be performed in a time-sensitive manner. We tested both the capability of FEER to differentiate states of pulseless electrical activity, and its feasibility in the out-of-hospital setting using mobile, battery-powered ultrasound systems. Trained emergency physicians (EP) applied FEER to assessing basic ventricular function by 'eye-balling' in less than 10 seconds in prehospital cardiac arrest victims who were being resuscitated. True pulseless electrical activity (PEA) was defined according to the ERC as 'clinical absence of cardiac output despite electrical activity'. In contrast, any PEA was classified as a 'pseudo-PEA' when cardiac output was visualized by echocardiography. Seventy-eight CPR cases (age 66 ± 19 years) were included. On arrival of the EP on the scene, a true PEA was suspected in 31/78 cases. However, in 20/31 PEA cases cardiac wall movement was detected (pseudo-PEA) and correctable causes such as pericardial tamponade (four cases), poor ventricular function (14 cases) and hypovolemia (two cases) were treated. Fourteen out of 20 pseudo-PEA cases survived to hospital admission. In 11/30 PEA cases, no cardiac wall movement was visible (true PEA). All such patients died on the scene. FEER-based changes in therapy were induced in 25/31 cases. Application of FEER was feasible within a 10-second time-frame of CPR interruptions. While differentiating PEA states, FEER has the ability to identify a pseudo-PEA state, allowing further treatment of the underlying disorder on the scene to improve outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical CareSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207