Self-selective recovery of photoluminescence in amphiphilic polymer encapsulated PbS quantum dots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Self-selected recovery of the photoluminescence (PL) of amphiphilic polymer encapsulated PbS quantum dots (QDs) was observed in water for the first time and possible mechanisms were proposed based on investigations by means of transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction and fluorescence spectroscopy. Water-soluble PbS QDs were synthesized by transferring monodispersed QDs capped with hydrophobic ligands of oleylamine from an organic solvent into water via amphiphilic polymers poly(maleic anhydride-alt-1-octadecene-co-poly(ethylene glycol)). The water transfer process leads to a double size distribution (5.6 ± 0.9 nm and 2.7 ± 0.4 nm), attributed to ligand etching together with Ostwald ripening, as well as the fast decay of PL. The automatic recovery of the PL in PbS QDs stored in water in the dark for 3 months was only observed for the subset of smaller QDs and is largely due to the removal of surface defects with aging, as evidenced by the decreased percentage of unpassivated surface atoms from XPS studies. In contrast, the PL of the subset of larger QDs in the same sample does not self-recover in water and can only be slightly recovered by transferring them into environments with less external quenches. The results strongly suggest that it is the surface defect in the larger QDs themselves, introduced during Ostwald ripening, that is primarily responsible for their non-emitting status or rather low PL intensity under different conditions. The increase of unpassivated Pb atoms in larger PbS QDs after the 3 month aging has been confirmed by XPS, which explains their non-recovery behavior in water. The PL-recovered QD sample in water is very stable and shows comparable photostability to the initial QDs dispersed in an organic phase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".