MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053870179 · doi:10.1142/s0217984901001458

A SIMPLE NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH TO INVARIANT IMAGE RECOGNITION

2001· article· en· W2053870179 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters B · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceInvariant (physics)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Time delay neural networkCellular neural networkComputationProbabilistic neural networkImage processingSegmentationFeature extractionComputer visionImage (mathematics)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose a simple neural network architecture for invariant image recognition. The proposed neural network architecture contains three specialized modules. The neurons from the first module are connected in a cellular neural network structure, which is responsible for image processing: edge detection and segmentation. The second module is a feed forward neural network for invariant feature extraction from the sensorial layer: computation of the pair distribution function and bond angle distribution function. The third module is responsible for image classification. An application to the face recognition problem is also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it