MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053891069 · doi:10.3720/japt.72.603

Summary of the Methane Hydrate Second Mallik Production Test (2007)

2007· article· en· W2053891069 on OpenAlexaffabout
Masato Yasuda, S R Dallimore, The task force for production testi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum Technology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrateCabin pressurizationMethaneNatural gasPetroleum engineeringClathrate hydrateProduction (economics)Environmental scienceGeologyEngineeringWaste managementChemistryEconomicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following the success of the first gas hydrate production test in JAPEC/JNOC/GSC Mallik 5L-38 Methane Hydrate Research Well in 2002, MH21 Research Consortium for Methane Hydrate Resources and Natural Resources Canada jointly conducted the second production test in the Mallik area, Northwest Territories, Canada applying depressurization method in the early April of 2007. During the twelve and half hours of the pump operation, at least 830 Sm3 of gas was produced from a gas hydrate bearing formation until the sand problem put an end to the production. The result brought us positive perspective about the applicability of the method, as well as many technical challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japanese Association for Petroleum TechnologySame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207