MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053906935 · doi:10.1061/41187(420)37

Internal PCCP Force Main Deterioration—Analysis and Rehabilitation

2011· article· en· W2053906935 on OpenAlexaffabout
G.H.F. Mak

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsCameco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionPipeline transportService lifeWater pipeGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceMaterials sciencePetroleum engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a case study of a Prestressed Concrete Cylinder Pipe (PCCP) system that is experiencing deterioration and a failure resulting from internal corrosion. The corrosion mechanism is Sulfuric Acid attack due to Hydrogen Sulfide gas (H2S) generated from the wastewater. The PCCP pipeline is located in Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada and was constructed in 1979. The nominal inside diameter is 1350 mm (54") and the pipeline was designed as a sewage force main. In 1999, approximately 75 m (246 feet) of the pipe failed and was replaced with HDPE pipe. In 2008, an internal inspection was conducted downstream of the failed section. The inspection was conducted using man entry and by close circuit television (CCTV). The inspection found five (5) pipe sections under severe corrosion attack where the interior concrete surfaces near the crown of the pipe had deteriorated exposing the reinforcing. Another nine (9) sections also showed early signs of H2S attack. A post inspection hydraulic analysis indicated the deteriorating pipe section does not flow full, and the hydraulic regime along this section is supercritical transitioning to subcritical resulting in a hydraulic jump forming within the pipe. The wastewater contains high concentration of sulfides. The turbulent flow conditions at the hydraulic jump exacerbate the release of H2S gas from the aqueous phase to the air phase. The H2S gas collects near the crown of the pipe and initiates corrosion attack on the concrete surface. A rehabilitation strategy was developed to extend the service life of the PCCP force main.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207